A Member of the Cancer Information Network
Cancer Information by State:
  arrow Patient Home   arrow Professional Home   arrow Newsletters   arrow Feedback Survey  
Main Menu
Quick Links
Information by Disease
Cancer News
Conference Coverage
Oncology Stocks
AZN$44.82-0.37 (-0.82%)
NVS$53.13-0.16 (-0.3%)
SNY$37.67-0.01 (-0.03%)
GSK$41.530.06 (0.14%)
click here
Cancer News: Lung Cancer: Article   Printable Version 


Lung Cancer News
PET-CT Detects More Advanced Disease in Patients with NSCLC

Researchers from Canada have reported that preoperative whole-body positron emission tomography, computed tomography (PET-CT), and cranial imaging identifies more patients with mediastinal and extrathoracic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than conventional staging. However, some patients were upstaged incorrectly by PET-CT. The details of this study were reported in the August 16, 2009 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.[1]

Computerized tomography (CT) and positron-emission tomography (PET) are important diagnostic techniques for staging of patients with NSCLC. However, each technique has limitations. A combined PET-CT machine has been developed and has undergone limited evaluation. The integrated PET-CT machine combines the structural information obtained by CT with the metabolic information obtained by PET into one set of images. One advantage of this approach is that small lesions detected with PET can be more precisely located using CT. Another potential advantage is that PET-CT will detect patients with metastatic disease and reduce the number of thoracotomies performed. For example, researchers from Denmark have recently reported: “The use of PET-CT for preoperative staging of NSCLC reduced both the total number of thoracotomies and the number of futile thoracotomies but did not affect overall mortality.”

The current study was a randomized trial in 337 patients with Stage I-IIIA NSCLC. Patients were randomly allocated to be staged with PET-CT or conventional staging with an abdominal CT and a bone scan. Patients in both groups had cranial examinations with CT or MRI. Extent of disease was correctly upstaged in 13.8% of patients in the PET-CT group and 6.8% of conventionally staged patients. Upstaged patients were spared a thoracotomy. Extent of disease was incorrectly upstaged in 4.8% of PET-CT patients versus 0.6% of conventionally staged patients. PET-CT understaged 14.9% of patients versus 29.6% for conventional staging. At three years a similar number of patients had died in both groups. These authors concluded that PET-CT could accurately upstage some patients who could avoid thoractomy. However, some patients would be falsely upstaged by this technique.

Comments: It would appear that more patients benefit from upstaging by not having a thoracotomy than are harmed by overstaging; this would deny these patients a thoracotomy and make PET-CT a useful staging test for NSCLC. These results combined with data from other studies suggest that PET-CT has no impact on survival of patients with NSCLC.

Reference:

[1] Maziak DE, Darling GE, Inculet RI, et al. Positron emission tomography in staging early lung cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;151:221-228.



© 1998-2007 OncoEd.com All Rights Reserved.

These materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All readers should verify all information and data before administering any drug, therapy or treatment discussed herein. Neither the editors nor the publisher accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information or consequences from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.
© 1998-2007 OncoEd, Inc  All Rights Reserved.

These materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All readers should verify all information and data before administering any drug, therapy or treatment discussed herein. Neither the editors nor the publisher accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information or consequences from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.







© 1998-2007 CancerConsultants.com  All Rights Reserved.