A Member of the Cancer Information Network
Cancer Information by State:
  arrow Patient Home   arrow Professional Home   arrow Newsletters   arrow Feedback Survey  
Main Menu
Quick Links
Information by Disease
Cancer News
Conference Coverage
Oncology Stocks
AZN$44.82-0.37 (-0.82%)
NVS$53.13-0.16 (-0.3%)
SNY$37.67-0.01 (-0.03%)
GSK$41.530.06 (0.14%)
click here
Cancer News: Rectal Cancer: Article   Printable Version 


Rectal Cancer News
False-positive Results Are Common with Cancer Screening

Researchers affiliated with the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial have reported that the risk of obtaining a false-positive result from screening for prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer is high and becomes cumulatively higher with ongoing screening—after 14 screening tests, the cumulative risk of a false-positive is 60.4% for men and 48.8% for women. The results of this study were published in the May/June 2009 issue of the Annals of Family Medicine.[1]

Cancer screening has become an important component of preventive care because cancer is most treatable when caught in the early stages of development. In many instances screening has been shown to reduce mortality from cancer; for example, regular screening with Pap smear has significantly reduced the death rate from cervical cancer in the United States. There is also evidence that colorectal screening reduces mortality. Mammography screening remains controversial with some data suggesting overdiagnosis in one-third of patients. Screening for prostate cancer is so controversial that it is still not recommended by some major medical organizations.  However, it is unclear whether or not screening for some types of cancer reduces the mortality rates, as evidence indicates that some slow-growing cancers are being overdiagnosed; in such cases patients would often die of other causes before the cancer started causing symptoms. As a result, there is some controversy over the frequency and interval of cancer screening.

The PLCO Cancer Screening Trial is a randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening on disease-specific mortality. The study included 68,436 patients aged 55 to 74 who were randomized to receive screening or usual care. Participants received up to 14 screening tests over the course of three years. For women, the tests included vaginal ultrasounds, chest X-rays, sigmoidoscopies to examine the colon, and measurement of an ovarian cancer marker called CA-125. Men underwent chest X-rays, digital rectal examination, sigmoidoscopy, and measurement of prostate specific antigen (PSA).

After four screening tests, the cumulative risk of a false-positive result was 36.7% for men and 26.2% for women. After 14 tests, the cumulative risk for a false-positive result jumped to 60.4% for men and 48.8% for women. Furthermore, the cumulative risk of undergoing an unnecessary invasive biopsy procedure based on the results of a false-positive screening test was 28.5% for men and 22.1% for women.

Comments: The high rate of false-positives does not mean that all screening is “bad”; however, it indicates one of the risks of consistent, long-term screening. It is important to understand both the risks and benefits of screening and to make informed choices about preventive care.

Reference:

[1] Croswell JM, Kramer BS, Kreimer AR, et al. Cumulative incidence of false-positive results in repeated, multimodal cancer screening. Annals of Family Medicine. 2009; 7: 212-222.



© 1998-2007 OncoEd.com All Rights Reserved.

These materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All readers should verify all information and data before administering any drug, therapy or treatment discussed herein. Neither the editors nor the publisher accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information or consequences from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.
© 1998-2007 OncoEd, Inc  All Rights Reserved.

These materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All readers should verify all information and data before administering any drug, therapy or treatment discussed herein. Neither the editors nor the publisher accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information or consequences from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.







© 1998-2007 CancerConsultants.com  All Rights Reserved.